unity, justice and freedom ...
residual alcohol is alcohol, and if you have a man such intus, you quickly to ponder - it's significant that the public debate on disclosure or limit top salaries coincides exactly with the introduction of a minimum wage collapses - the latter incidentally, is often justified by the fact that someone who pays very low pay, and anyway only to grants of Federal speculate - well, yes, but be on the other side proud funded corresponding training places, which are difficult to place young people (more than 1 year in search) can be set virtually "subsidized". The state seems not to know quite where he wants to go, but one thing is certain: we write a golden era for the SED:
the absurd debate about executive pay and severance payments (and it is both clear that one has not to interfere what is meant by a Supervisory Board to pay a manager - it is their money), quite clearly grown out of envy and jealousy, madness is only because a fall on the hated MANAGER!. are limits on pop and film stars do not exist. What is next, is prescribed for me that has to cost a bottle of wine or a painting? Of course, the settlements are sometimes not part of the service, but still a part of the contract, which - includes not only salary and pension - knowing the gentlemen with job guarantee, lease concessions or other additives that. Who will be kicked out for no good reason (and directly blame the purposes of misconduct can be the manager usually does not - it carries just a risk and when the bill comes up, he is acclaimed for the same measures), which are entitled to a severance payment, and also get others, even for a possible failure or if they no longer use the service (severance, Part time, temporary support in finding a job ...).
second point is the funding for the hiring of under-qualified young people. That the state does not create the half of the apprenticeship, rather than to subsidize this number is a huge misfortune, for it is simply the wrong signals in the direction of economy: cheap labor, which do not dare to complain, to be financed by the state at the expense of those who are qualified and which are now no training places, because they take away low-skilled because of Rule exploit? The same madness as that with the quotas for women, only more obvious!
third point of the minimum wage. Originally planned as a clever move by the SPD to future to have a campaign on individual professional groups, sent by Angela Merkel, but only partially turned away because they left the determination of the wage bargaining parties. Retraction of the harvest, however, the SED, the future embarrassment of astronomical wage demands (exactly - until now I could not explain why a postman earn more should I student assistant) for many, many jobs (I think of florists, gardeners, cleaners , harvesters ...) will advertise for themselves - as a clear protest party she is always condemned by the opposition and may therefore also stir up dust with no real concepts. In contrast, we do not arrive. What good arguments compared with polemical Slogans are worth, has recently amply demonstrated the way of the Lord Professor Kirchhoff in and out of politics ...
have one thing in all these examples of recent social debates (even if it is a small number, but I could go on, for example, with tuition fees or the tax on the rich, raising the top tax rates, etc.) have in common: Highly skilled people are disadvantaged in favor of the stupid and lazy. Already, Germany paid assiduous in the study of top executives who will then pay in the United States their taxes: passing the more mobile groups of the population may leave more land as it is already currently the case - if not prevented, the former are.
Conclusion: Germany does not know what it wants to govern, therefore, unfortunately, our primal instincts and not just good - that can and will be the guys at extreme right and left as before be easily use to make and if they have more say, well , then it will in future not be better ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment